Welcome to the GGC Autocross Program › Forums › GGC Autocross Forums › Autocross Discussion › Course map for june 15
- This topic has 16 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 6 months ago by Mark Mervich.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 11, 2013 at 8:06 pm #1864Mark MervichParticipant
I must be the first person who’s curiosity has overcome his patience 🙂
I have made some adjustments to my car which are working out well. I want to try them again B)
Yes, I am sorry, but I did figure out how to make the FF faster. :woohoo:
MarkJune 11, 2013 at 8:17 pm #1865Jeff RobertsParticipantHere it is, just for you Mark. 🙂 If you right-click on the image and select “copy image url” and load that in another browser window, you can get the full resolution version for best printing.
[img]http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2829/9016533961_6d40b52d5a_o.jpg[/img]
June 11, 2013 at 8:22 pm #1866Mark MervichParticipantThank you, Jeff. Looks very technical 🙂 But I can never really figure it out until I walk the course.
MarkJune 11, 2013 at 8:29 pm #1867Barry TwycrossParticipantAm I right in thinking “Technical” is a codeword meaning tight and twisty and good for MINIs? The first gate of the slalom looks very tight, I’m not sure I’ve seen a 20ft one before.
June 11, 2013 at 8:41 pm #1868Ryan RichModeratorLooks like a great course!
See you all there Saturday!
June 12, 2013 at 10:45 am #1877Dave SparksParticipant[quote=”btwyx” post=1539]Am I right in thinking “Technical” is a codeword meaning tight and twisty and good for MINIs? The first gate of the slalom looks very tight, I’m not sure I’ve seen a 20ft one before.[/quote]
First gate is 40 ft. The others are 50.
The rest of the course is fairly open, with the exception of the chicane in the middle between the two sweepers. This one is all about speed control.
June 12, 2013 at 11:03 am #1878Dave DunwoodieParticipant[quote=”davidlsparks” post=1549][quote=”btwyx” post=1539]Am I right in thinking “Technical” is a codeword meaning tight and twisty and good for MINIs? [/quote]
This one is all about speed control.[/quote]
Speed control = Technical.
And figuring out the correct line. Looks like a fun & challenging course! 🙂June 12, 2013 at 6:53 pm #1879Justin TsangParticipant40 & 50 ft, ouch. minimum spacing for slalom is 45 ft for the SCCA rulebook and generally 55-60ft.
June 12, 2013 at 6:56 pm #1880Dave SparksParticipant[quote=”justint5387″ post=1551]40 & 50 ft, ouch. minimum spacing for slalom is 45 ft for the SCCA rulebook and generally 55-60ft.[/quote]
It’s only the first gate. You should be able to figure out a way take advantage of that.
We had a 50 ft and a 60 ft slalom at the last event.
June 12, 2013 at 7:04 pm #1881Justin TsangParticipantJust wondering why not make the first 2 cones 50ft apart as well when there are space on the exit of the left hander? 40ft is quite a pinch and no line option
June 12, 2013 at 7:14 pm #1882Dave SparksParticipant[quote=”justint5387″ post=1553]Just wondering why not make the first 2 cones 50ft apart as well when there are space on the exit of the left hander? 40ft is quite a pinch and no line option[/quote]
Because it’s supposed to be a challenge.
June 12, 2013 at 7:48 pm #1883Justin TsangParticipantIMO, courses does not have to be tight to be a challenge.
June 12, 2013 at 8:01 pm #1884Dave SparksParticipant[quote=”justint5387″ post=1555]IMO, courses does not have to be tight to be a challenge.[/quote]
I guess you’re lucky I didn’t throw in a 25 ft Chicago box. 🙂
June 13, 2013 at 2:21 am #1887mack TsangParticipantNo challenge if there’s only one line to take it.
June 13, 2013 at 3:13 am #1891James KeaneParticipantAw man, not another tight n’ twisty one. 😛
Don’t get me wrong. I like a good technical challenge, but what I really love is the sensation of speed and the challenge of fast sweepers. In retrospect, some of my favorite courses have been a good mix of both tight and fast – often requiring crossovers to make use of the limited space we have. We just had a very tight one last round, so I was hoping for something more open this time.
It should be a good course – I am just putting in my vote for a Need for Speed on the next one
Cheers,
James -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.